RE: [ISN] Stolen computer may contain Navy secrets

From: mea culpa <jericho_at_dimensional.com>
Date: Fri 21 Aug 1998 - 17:24:02 CDT
[Moderator: Several more people have mailed in with much the same
 response. Despite working in secured SCIFs, and despite regulations
 that *should* closely monitor the coming and going of electronic
 media, they often don't. Responses came in from AF/Navy contractors.]
 

Reply From: Trevor Gryffyn <tgryffyn@meetinghousetech.com>

> [Moderator: Sounds like this laptop was not in a SCIF at all, but
>  carried around the ship at times. Even if a SCIF based laptop,
>  I have been in SCIFs and SCI areas that did not get searches
>  on the way out, even carrying a laptop bag.]

I worked for a contractor and was in an out of SCIFs all the time and they
never really checked.  They were only secure in the fact that they were
shielded to some degree, had their own specially grounded electric circuit,
etc.  The company did TEMPEST testing so we had a lot of little labs that
had to prevent stray signals from getting in during tests and also keeping
things inside that we didn't want someone else to see via any form of
TEMPEST or other emissions based monitoring.

But all in all, it was a really unsecure environment.  Lots of Simplex
locks, but really slack security (my ex wandered in and was wandering the
halls for 20 minutes before someone stopped her).

-Gryffyn


-o-
Subscribe: mail majordomo@sekurity.org with "subscribe isn".
Today's ISN Sponsor: Repent Security Incorporated [www.repsec.com]
Received on Sun Aug 23 19:50:56 1998
Google
 
Web www.infosecnews.org