From: phreak moi <hackerelite@deathsdoor.com>
http://www.wired.com/news/news/culture/story/14219.html
Body of Evidence
by Beverly Hanly
4:00am 5.Aug.98.PDT
Real criminals are tried in real courts, so why shouldn't virtual
criminals be tried in virtual courts?
A handful of legal scholars from the Institute on the Arts and Civic
Dialogue (IACD) are mulling over the question and will convene Wednesday
to discuss whether virtual courts are the best forum for cybercrime trials
and if a virtual legal system could lead to new legal processes regarding
real world crimes.
The experts will join multimedia artist Shu Lea Cheang, creator of the
Brandon project, for a webcast forum from 8 to 11 pm, EDT, at the Harvard
Law School.
The group will play out a fictitious courtroom drama based on several
disputes involving cyberetiquette, gender identity, and the hazy line
between fantasy vs. reality as the first public forum in the year-long
Brandon project commissioned by New York's Guggenheim Museum. Brandon
explores issues of gender identity and the consequences of experimenting
with sexuality in real life and in cyberspace.
The ongoing media and legal debate regarding hate speech and the
proliferation of sexual content on the Internet and whether or not these
are harmful -- and to whom -- is the territory the mock trial will cover.
Harvard theater director Liz Diamond will collaborate with Cheang to guide
the group as they dramatize elements drawn from real-life sexual assault
cases, including that of the project's namesake Teena Brandon, a
transsexual who was murdered in Nebraska in 1993. Other cases will involve
a virtual trial for "cyberrape," a MUD character named Mr. Bungle, and
the FBI arrest of Michigan student Jake Baker for his rape-and-murder
fantasy about a fellow student posted to a Usenet newsgroup in 1994.
Actors will play the roles of victims and perpetrators, while professors
from Harvard, University of Virginia, and Columbia law schools will act as
"standing jurors" to examine and comment on the legalities.
"This is a venue where you can experiment with the process and substance
of these [cyberlaw] cases," said Jennifer Mnookin, professor of law at
Virginia's School of Law in Charlottesville, who will sit in on the
session. She feels that virtual worlds like LambdaMOO can provide a new
and more appropriate arena for dispute resolution.
"Part of what's at issue here is how much someone can be hurt with words,"
said Mnookin. "Someone who commits a violation in cyberspace shouldn't
necessarily be subject to consequences in real courtrooms. Something like
the LambdaMOO 'cyberrape' was appropriately settled in a virtual court.
The perpetrator was expelled from that world, his virtual identity was
annihilated -- he was 'toaded.' What is a violation in one world might not
be in another."
Virtual penalties can translate from one world to the other as well.
Cheang, in her virtual court, suggests the idea of "virtual castration" as
an alternative to "chemical castration" advocated by some as a way of
dealing with sexual offenders.
The August public event in Cambridge, Massachusetts, is the first time
since the Brandon project began on 20 June that Cheang will be able to
interact with both a live and a Net audience.
"The test will serve as a base toward constructing a digiarchitextual
space of a virtual court at the Guggenheim's [proposed] virtual museum,"
said Cheang, who will collaborate with an architect of physical spaces to
create a "courtroom" at the museum. "My work has always fused actual and
virtual space."
Netizens need nothing more than an Internet connection to tune in to the
mock trial. But Cheang also wants to include a public that has no access
to Net technology.
Anyone in the Harvard area who's interested can physically attend the
staged trial. In New York, street audiences can visit the Guggenheim
SoHo's video wall, which is made up of 75 contiguous 40-inch projection
cubes. The video wall will display images from the Brandon project and
audiences will be able to interact at scheduled times.
"We're not sure how the 'experimentation' with the audience will go," said
Cheang. "Maybe we'll fail badly. But it is this uncertainty, this feeling
that we're exploring new ground in public interaction that is most
exciting for me and my collaborators here at the Institute."
Law professor Mnookin looks at the experiment as a venue that can open up
the dialog on cyberlaw issues. "What's interesting to me about 'virtual
law' is that it's much more obvious than in the real world that the rules
are malleable, that they're created by the participants.
"In the real world, it's easy to take the legal processes for granted, to
assume that [those processes] can't easily be transformed," she continued.
"If virtual worlds are used as laboratories, it's easier to recognize the
possibilities for change -- both within a virtual environment, and, just
maybe, in the real world as well."
The Brandon Project is hosted at Harvard in conjunction with the brand-new
IACD until 14 August. IACD puts artists in various media together with a
community of scholars, journalists, and civic activists to explore current
events and controversies.
After the test trial, Cheang will move on to Amsterdam, Netherlands, to
begin setting up the next live installation of the project: "Digi Gender,
Social Body: Under the Knife, Under the Spell of Anesthesia," to be
webcast in September 1998. "Would the Jurors Please Stand Up? Crime and
Punishment as Net Spectacle" is scheduled for May 1999.
-o-
Subscribe: mail majordomo@sekurity.org with "subscribe isn".
Today's ISN Sponsor: New Dimensions International [www.newdimensions.net]
Received on Wed Aug 5 20:58:42 1998