[ISN] EPIC crypto conference report, from time.com/Netly News

From: mea culpa <jericho_at_dimensional.com>
Date: Tue 09 Jun 1998 - 04:14:41 CDT
Forwarded From: "Jay D. Dyson" <jdyson@techreports.jpl.nasa.gov>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Courtesy of Cryptography List.

Posted by Jonathan Gregg <jgregg@pathfinder.com>

http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly/afternoon/0,1012,2044,00.html

Fish & Barrel
by Declan McCullagh

For seven years the savviest of the online privacy mavens, a few dozen
select cryptoscenti, have gathered in Washington, D.C. 

Held each June, the Electronic Privacy Information Center's annual
encryption conference gave them a chance to kick back, catch up -- and, of
course, bemoan the U.S. government's latest attempts to coerce everyone
into using only data-scrambling software with backdoors for government
surveillance. 

Sound obscure? Well, it was, for a while. 

But now, dozens of congressional hearings and millions of high-tech
lobbying dollars later, the EPIC conference has outgrown its cozy origins
on the top floor of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace -- so
much so that today's conference had to be moved to a downtown hotel to
accommodate the nearly 300 attendees. 

One thing that shows no signs of changing, though, is the positions of the
hapless government representatives whom EPIC lines up on panel after panel
so the audience (very politely, of course) can take potshots at them, like
gleeful teens aiming their BB guns at a row of empty soda cans. Today was
no exception. 

Top Justice Department official Robert Litt showed up to defend the
controversial White House rule banning overseas sales of secure encryption
products, but in response to a question admitted he had never read a
crucial report by the National Research Council that said such rules were
misguided. (Later, a Canadian crypto official said that even they had read
the study and "like it very much.") 

At lunch, Jim Bidzos, president of RSA Data Security, offered the
unsurprising prediction that no encryption legislation -- bad or good --
would pass Congress this year, and the only thing that will eliminate
current export controls is near-irreversible harm to American companies
when their unhindered overseas competitors gain the upper hand. 

"This policy is badly broken," Bidzos said. No need to decode that message.
- --By Declan McCullagh/Washington

http://www.epic.org/
http://pathfinder.com/netly/editorial/0,1012,931,00.html
http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly/opinion/0,1042,1722,00.html


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBNXyYuOe1NzV7EsRFAQGSXQQAmTZC5dcKsqWL18nhqW12PnL0PQ6rnqP0
vYpQmXIM0ahM1wa+v79agYg2Q3j1/oCoWhuaHwOZTdjG2OUOECgvCaQRe1WItWF1
EZog9zEAAEqTUh/rIMHdZUzvrjyRCc7NsBGBme52Zq41bpQ+RF8xU5fJxQ+E2bdh
VKeO++V1lgA=
=R5Ar
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-o-
Subscribe: mail majordomo@sekurity.org with "subscribe isn".
Today's ISN Sponsor: Repent Security Incorporated [www.repsec.com]
Received on Tue Jun 9 12:37:17 1998
Google
 
Web www.infosecnews.org