[ISN] Pirates Cash in on Weak Chips (encrypt!)

From: mea culpa <jericho_at_dimensional.com>
Date: Fri 22 May 1998 - 15:41:05 CDT
Forwarded From: Aleph One <aleph1@nationwide.net>

http://www.wired.com/news/news/technology/story/12459.html

   Pirates Cash In on Weak Chips
   by James Glave 
   
   5:03am  22.May.98.PDT
   An extensive and well-organized phone-card piracy scam that came to
   light this week in Germany has proven a multimillion dollar lesson in
   the perils of hiding sensitive data rather than encrypting it, a
   German computer security group said.
   
   "What I think people can learn from this is how expensive 'security by
   obscurity' can be," said Andy Mueller-Maguhn, spokesman for the Chaos
   Computer Club.
   
   Earlier this week, the German weekly newsmagazine Focus reported that
   scam artists from the Netherlands had flooded Germany with millions of
   illegally recharged telephone debit cards. The cards, designed for
   Deutsche Telekom payphones, use a simple EEP-ROM chip,
   developed by Siemens Corp., that deducts value from the card as
   minutes are used up.
   
   Ordinarily, once the credit balance reaches zero, the cards are thrown
   away or given to collectors. But the Dutch pirates found a way to
   bypass the simple security and recharge the cards without leaving any
   physical evidence of tampering. The pirates bought up thousands of
   spent cards in bulk from collectors, recharged them, and resold them
   cheaply to tobacco shops and other retail outlets across Germany.
   
   The magazine said that the German association of tobacconist
   wholesalers assesses the losses at DM60 million, or US$34 million
   dollars.
   
   With revenues last year of close to US$38 billion, Deutsche Telekom AG
   is Europe's largest telco and the third largest carrier worldwide.
   
   But according to Mueller-Maguhn and other card experts, the Dutch
   piracy operation is only the latest, albeit the most widespread, scam
   against Deutsche Telekom, which has encountered security problems with
   its cards since they were introduced in the 1980s.
   
   A spokesperson for Deutsche Telekom handling the card piracy issue did
   not return Wired News phone calls. It is not known if the pirates are
   in custody or still at large.
   
   According to Marcus Kuhn, a smart-card physical security expert at
   Cambridge University in the United Kingdom, the first generation of
   phone cards did not include any encryption, and were easily modified.
   
   "Anyone who observed, with a logic analyzer, the data traffic between
   a card and a public phone could fully understand the protocol and
   implement it on a simple microcontroller plus very little auxiliary
   logic," said Kuhn.
   
   Kuhn and Mueller-Maguhn said the flawed card was replaced in March
   1995 with the current model, which contains another Siemens chip, the
   SLE4433 -- commonly known as the "Eurochip." Though the Eurochip does
   contain some simple cryptography, the pirates soon heard about a bug
   hidden in the hardware that could allow the stored value to be reset.
   
   "[The Eurochip] has a bug in the chipmask, allowing [a cracker] to
   reload almost all the bits using an normally unused counter," said
   Mueller-Maguhn.
   
   Kuhn said that he examined the flawed Eurochip under a microscope
   about six months ago, and saw what he described as "a typical
   lowest-cost cryptoalgorithm."
   
   Siemens declined to speak with Wired News for this story, other than
   to release a brief statement.
   
   "Siemens has devoted considerable resources to the development of
   leading-edge chip card technology, as well as to cutting chip
   development cycle time in an ongoing effort to identify possible
   security issues in next-generation technology," the statement said.
   
   Mueller-Maguhn and other sources made it clear that the Dutch pirates
   were not technically adept crackers or hackers. Rather, he said, they
   were con men who likely bought the know-how, or hired the person who
   discovered the bug, and then bought spent phone cards from collectors
   to reload them in the Netherlands.
   
   "Codebreaking is not an adequate description for this kind of attack,
   as it relies on simple electrical engineering errors in the chip
   layout and not on cryptoanalysis," said Kuhn.
   
   "These people weren't hackers, they did it solely for the money,"
   added Andreas Bogk, another member of the Chaos Computer Club.
   
   In the meantime, there is little Deutsche Telekom can do to stop the
   scam, because cracked cards are indistinguishable from the real thing,
   and the costs of tracking the pirate cards are prohibitive. Siemens
   and Deutsche Telekom are reportedly working on a new version of the
   Eurochip, called Eurochip2.
   
   But Mueller-Maguhn said that he isn't holding his breath that the
   companies will get it right on the third time.
   
   "Deutsche Telekom doesn't seem to learn about this in the chip-card
   business," he said. "They used [security by obscurity] in the first
   technique, then changed to security by obscurity in the second
   technique and now [will likely] do it the third time," Mueller-Maguhn
   said.
   
   "We'll have fun engineering the bugs in the Eurochip 2," he added.
   
   

-o-
Subscribe: mail majordomo@sekurity.org with "subscribe isn".
Today's ISN Sponsor: Repent Security Incorporated [www.repsec.com]
Received on Fri May 22 17:53:25 1998
Google
 
Web www.infosecnews.org