[ISN] DoD News Briefing / 4.16.98 / Eligible Receiver

From: William Knowles <erehwon_at_dis.org>
Date: Sun 26 Apr 1998 - 21:13:50 CDT
Does anyone know anything about the attempted hack into
the Special Operations Forces computer? This is a new one 
on me, Of course again, Someone could have been pinging 
their box all night, and in the GAO's opinion, that's a 
hack attempt. :)

Cheers!

William Knowles
erehwon@dis.org


[TRANSCRIPT]
 
DoD News Briefing
 
Thursday, April 16, 1998 - 1:30 p.m. (EDT)
Mr. Kenneth H. Bacon, ASD (PA)
----------------------------------------------------------------

[Snip...]

Q: Ken, could you give us a bit of a readout on this war game,
ELIGIBLE RECEIVER and what steps the Pentagon is taking to 
shore up computer security?
 
A: Sure. First is, ELIGIBLE RECEIVER is a game that was played 
by the Joint Staff last June. It tested our ability to deal with 
cyber attacks. It was directed only against our unclassified 
systems, not against classified systems, and it found that we 
have a lot of work to do to provide better security. We're not 
alone in this regard. Most businesses, many private institutions, 
many individuals have a lot of work to do in improving their 
ability to protect their computers and computer systems. But 
because of ELIGIBLE RECEIVER and the subsequent attack by hackers 
against unclassified computer networks earlier this year, 
John Hamre, the deputy secretary of defense, has launched a
number of initiatives to improve computer security in the 
Pentagon.

The first is, of course, something that we achieved by holding
ELIGIBLE RECEIVER, and in fact it was the point of ELIGIBLE 
RECEIVER which was to improve everybody's awareness of the 
threats posed to computer systems today. And ELIGIBLE RECEIVER 
I think succeeded beyond its planner's wildest dreams in 
elevating the awareness of threats to our computer systems.

Since then we've had a series of meetings with the Justice 
Department, with the Vice President's office and other agencies 
in the government to address, on a broad scale basis, issues of 
computer security. In this building in particular, we've 
appointed a Chief Information Officer, Art Money, who's going 
to become the Assistant Secretary of Defense for command, 
control and communications. He's been nominated to do that. 
He is in charge of being the main focal point for efforts
to improve computer security across the military.

This is a daunting prospect. We have in the Department of 
Defense 2.1 million computers, 100,000 local area networks, 
and more than 100 long distance networks. Of course some of 
these are highly secure, and those are the ones that receive 
the most attention, but we've come to realize that we have 
to pay a lot of attention to just standard computer networks 
that transmit e-mail and other information such as payroll 
information, etc.
 
One of the things that Dr. Hamre did earlier this year was 
issue a memorandum directing that a number of actions be taken. 
One was, for instance, that every computer network in the 
Department of Defense has to have a named security officer, 
sort of a central point of contact to go to to deal with 
problems for that particular network.

There are a whole series of other efforts to develop better 
ways for detecting attacks. We're putting a lot of effort 
into better ways of detecting attacks against our computer 
systems. In the fiscal years 1999 to 2002, the Department 
of Defense will spend $3.6 billion to address computer 
security issues, so it's something we are devoting a lot 
of resources and a lot of time to, but we have a ways 
to go. I think we are making progress, and we will make 
progress at an accelerating rate as we grapple with the 
dimensions of this problem.

Q: Have there been any investigations on the apparent 
attempts to hack into the Special Operations Forces 
computer?

A: I'm not up to speed on that. We'll get somebody to 
look into that. I assume if we know of attempts to break 
into our computer systems we investigate them. That's one 
of the things we've talked about with the Justice Department.

One of the things we've looked at is ways to set up a better
counter-intelligence system for detecting attacks and for 
going after the people who are making the attacks. In addition, 
we're trying to do a much better job of staying in touch with 
our teenage children and others to learn the latest hacker 
techniques so we can be one step ahead of them rather than 
several steps behind. But as all of you know, that's easier 
said than done.
 
But there are a variety of efforts across a wide spectrum of 
issues that we're taking here to improve computer security. 
Obviously this is a moving train. We've got two problems. 
We've got to make the switches as we continue to pump 
increasing amounts of important information over the computer 
systems. That's the first thing. And we have to keep up with 
technology that's changing very rapidly.

Q: Do you agree with the assessment that this could have 
drastically impacted the electrical grid in the country, 
number one? Have they had mal-intent? And number two, 
why did they not attempt to go into the classified, or 
to penetrate the classified systems?
 
A: There are tests done on a fairly regular basis against 
a number of the classified systems to make sure that they 
are in fact secure. By virtue of the fact that they are 
secure they receive much more attention.

I guess I'd rather not make apocalyptic statements about the
electrical grid, but we did learn that computer hackers could 
have a dramatic impact on the nation's infrastructure, 
including the electrical power grid. That, of course, is why 
there's a whole commission set up to deal with that, the 
Commission on Critical Infrastructure.

One of the things that Deputy Secretary Hamre did back early 
this year when we were subject to attack by hackers, the 
unclassified systems, was talk to the President about this 
because the President and the Vice President are both very 
concerned about computer security and infrastructure stability 
generally.


== 
There's a compelling reason to master information & news.
Clearly there will be better job and financial opportunites.
Other high stakes will be missed by people if they don't
master and connect information.  --  Everette Dennis
==
http://www.dis.org/erehwon/


-o-
Subscribe: mail majordomo@sekurity.org with "subscribe isn".
Today's ISN Sponsor: Dimensional Communications (www.dim.com)
Received on Sun Apr 26 23:07:29 1998
Google
 
Web www.infosecnews.org