[Moderator: InfoWar Digest is based off www.infowar.com, run by Winn
Schwartau. Hit the web page for subscription information, or read
further.]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Betty G.O'Hearn" <betty@infowar.com>
Subject: Infowar Digest Volume 3: Number 06 March 25,1998
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Infowar Digest Volume 3: Number 06 March 25,1998
1) Microwar and UAV's
2) PCCIP, FBI, and Real Life
3) Micro Warfare
4) RedTeam Mail List
5) CIA Support of Drug Traffickers
6) Assistance Wanted KGB Files
7) Wanted: Expert Witness for Mitnick Trial
8) Hacker Shuts Down Airport
9) Press Release
1) From: Bertil Haggman <<bertil.haggman@helsingborg.se>
To: betty@infowar.com
Date: March 10, 1998
Subject: Microwar and UAVs
Micro UAVs
NPS develops mini-surveillance aircraft
by Dale Kuska
Public Affairs Office, Naval Postgraduate School, June 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------
A SEAL creeps silently through dense bushes, approaching a
structure where American citizens are held captive. He needs
to see inside that building; find out where the hostages are
held; find out how many people are keeping the captives, but
how does he do it. Easy! He reaches down to his belt, opens
up a small canister and releases a micro-UAV (unmanned aerial
vehicle) -- a two-inch rotary aircraft equipped with all the
sensors he needs to fly inside that building and assess the
situation.
Sound futuristic? Vehicles like this are rapidly
approaching reality, and researchers right here at NPS are
playing a key role. David Jenn, a Professor of Electrical and
Computer Engineering and Ph.D. student Bob Vitaly are working
on bringing these future vehicles to the fleet.
Our particular vehicle is remotely piloted, meaning there
will be someone on the ground providing the control, like a
remote control car. There would be a camera inside to provide
real time video information, which gives the operator the
ability to see where he's flying," explained Jenn.
"The main uses of a vehicle like this would obviously,
for one, be surveillance. But you can also use them for
inspection of hazardous materials or areas, and hostage
situations. It would be something portable, so it can be
carried on a SEAL's belt, for example, and, when he needs it,
he can simply open the canister and fly it off," he continued.
"These things are very small, they're covert, they are very
difficult to see, and even if you do see them, they're very
difficult to shoot down."
The primary focus of the researchers here is to provide
an innovative method for providing power to the small
aircraft.
"Our particular area is the possibility of providing
energy to these vehicles. One of the problems they have is if
you use a battery, they are going to be very heavy. Batteries
will not provide a lot of power for a long duration of time,"
Jenn said.
"We're using an offboard source of energy. We would have
an antennae that tracks the vehicle and provides a microwave
beam that provides energy to the vehicle. The vehicle
receives it, rectifies it, then uses that energy to power the
motor," he added.
Vitaly says the work is really breaking ground in this
new field of study. "We've never seen anyone transfer power
in this way before. We've seen people do this with large
two-foot arrays before, but that simply would not work for a
vehicle that will be flying around," he said. "We've also
been able to use the body of the aircraft as an antenna."
In order to fit the sensors and intelligence into a small
graphite canister weighing no more than a piece of paper,
these micro-UAVs must do more than maximize use of space.
"The types of sensors DoD would like to see in here are a
video camera, radiation sensors, chemical sensors, and maybe
even GPS (Global Positioning System). There's also talk of
using these as communication relays. All of this equipment
can be packaged together, but it's the weight that the real
problem," Jenn explained.
Given the issues surrounding the weight of these tiny
vehicles, the research performed by Jenn and Vitaly could be
used in future versions, and the researchers are making
progress.
"One of the biggest advantages of using microwave power
is that you can make these UAVs smaller and smaller. With a
battery, if you continue making it smaller, you will lose
power," Jenn explained.
"We've already demonstrated we can transfer power with
microwaves. We've performed tests on the safety issues of
microwaves. We've shown that having multiple ground stations
(sending microwaves) is the best possible method. What we now
are going to do is show how we can power these UAVs using
radar systems in the NPS radar lab, which are systems the Navy
already has," Jenn said.
So how far away are these advanced micro-UAVs? They may
sound futuristic, but that is not the case. In fact, Jenn
says the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
will be flying a six-inch test rotary aircraft within the next
month.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 21:55:29 -0800
From: "Dr. Gerald L. Kovacich, CFE, CPP, CISSP" <<kovacich11@home.com>
To: "Betty G. O'Hearn" <<betty@infowar.com>
Subject: PCCIP, FBI, and Real Life
After reading the current articles posted on the IW site, I am
compelled
to make a "few" comments-observations:
PCCIP: The US Government is a political, bureaucratic body. Therefore,
anything done or said by the US Government is based on that fact. So,
no
one should be so naive as to think that anything meaningful would come
out of any of their studies. I don't know Mr. Forno's background, but
having been in that environment, he should have known better than to
expect anything better than what we got. Now, there may be some ruffled
feathers from some who may feel a little hurt that they were not called
upon to give their "wisdom" to the political PCCIP body. Many in
the InfoSec business, as well as many others, knew not only what the
outcome of the study would be, but why. It seems that the so-called
InfoSec "experts" are now coming out of the woodwork faster than
roaches
running away from RAID! They all want to testify before some body for
purposes of their ego, capitalizing on that for consulting purposes,
publicity, or other selfish reasons. When they are not called, they
complain, just like spoiled pro athletes! Consider this, maybe their
reputation
preceded them? Maybe their position was always obvious because they said
it so
often.
Maybe the politicians wanted to stack the deck with those of like
thinking. One important thing to remember - professionals don't complain
because of something
like that!Maybe that's what separates professional info warriors, ISSO's,
from the
hustlers.Besides, generals are made and promoted because they are
politicians.
So, what the "powers-to-be" wanted they got - someone to support what
they wanted to do. Now, lookat the recommendations and see who gained
from the results and who were the strongest voices in choosing the team
leader and others. Please ladies and gentleman, get a grip - not a
gripe!
Understanding the environment and this political body directing the
study, let's look at the results. Did it make the papers and maybe
heighten the awareness of the US Government, society and our global
citizens? Of course it did (every little bit helps). So, what's wrong
with that? What did you expect? Maybe the report could have been done
faster and cheaper, but hey, that's not how a political bureaucracy
works. I noticed Forno's comments (which may have been taken out of
context in the "snapshot paragraph") on the IW site did not address the
quality of the report or errors in it. Are we to assume that the report
was correct? If so, then it served its purpose.
What I find wrong with the report is the recommendations. Using our
precious tax dollars, we are again setting up a massive bureaucracy (I
understand Reno wants $64 million dollars for the National
Infrastructure
Protection Center!). To do what? According to Reuters Limited, Reno said,
"We hope
our nation's critical infrastructure will help keep our country save (I'm
just
quoting so don't blame me for typos) and secure as we begin to meet the
challenges of the
century ahead". Hello? Ms Reno, anybody home? How is the critical
infrastructure going to help
keep our country "save" and secure? It is because we have a "critical
infrastructure" that we are vulnerable! Hello?
Ms Reno also is quoted as saying, "Our systems are more vulnerable than
ever to attack because of our unprecedented reliance on technology". Wow!
What insight! If we
did not have technology,we would not have systems, therefore, we would
not have these types of
problems! Hello? Anybody home? How is the NIPC going to "combat threats
to infrastructure ranging from technology and telecommunications to
transportation"? Is it run by the FBI? Aren't
they reactive investigators? Did someone see a charter change in
responsibilities here? Are they
going to be the infrastructure access control people for us? Are they
going to aggressively monitor our systems and review audit trails (even
though no crime has been committed)? If so, we should start worrying
about the FBI, because the IRS will be pussy cats compared to these
guys!
Ms. Reno, your FBI can't even protect their web site from being hacked!
You are going to protect the critical infrastructure - almost all of it
entirely PRIVATE,
non-government-owned I might add - when you are being out-smarted by
teenagers? Let's start with protecting the DOJ web site first. Then call
us when you think it is secure. In the meantime, put those agents back on
the street fighting real crime - bank robbery, espionage, etc.
Using Toffler's analogy, we are using industrial age, Second Wave
processes (AGAIN) to solve an information age, Third Wave problem. It
will not work. We must operate at literally the speed of light, not the
speed of
government!
This leads us to the new FBI bureaucratic effort - nice try but no
cigar. Let's look at the money that will be expended and the
bureaucracy
and processes which will be put in place. Don't we have enough problems
with the DOJ and encryption? Now, we are going to welcome Big Brother
into our lives more than ever before! Why, to catch the teenie boppers?
Come on! They (FBI), along with many of us, owe our professional
careers to these kids! Add up the billions of US dollars that are
going
to be spent AND PROFITS MADE to protect our information systems in both
the government and business environments. Look how many new
millionaires
have been made and companies started because they provided an infosec
product. Wheel Group just sold for $124 million dollars? They would not
have been around except for the hackers. The owners owe their wealth to
these folks! In fact, they should hold a Hacker Appreciation Party and
invite hackers from near and far to free Pepsi and Pizza - at least
that! The Hackers? Yes, they do wrong. Yes, they should be caught and
punished with an understanding of what they did, much of it helping all
of us do a better job of protecting what should have been protected all
along. Look at the Mitnick case of justice gone bad. Hell, if I killed
someone I would have been treated better and a better chance at
justice!
The FBI has some very fine people trying to do the right thing. " But
it
don't make it the right thing"! Do they have processes in place to
react
rapidly? The FBI bureaucracy will still be there. Who are these men and
women who
will track down these "criminals"? What is their expertise? (They
graduated from the FBI
computer crime course? Please, let's not go there!). First, to get in
the FBI, you must have a clean record, no arrests/convictions, etc.
These folks are afraid to color outside the lines of a coloring book
and
probably let their kids know not to color outside those lines! Are
they
up to the task - I doubt it, but we'll see over time. Rules: you
don't get points for catching anyone under 21, nor do you get points
for
catching anyone who uses Internet-downloaded hacking tools - that is
too
easy! Also, no points for being handed a case by the business or govt.
ISSO or techie. No points either for referrals from the local police.
After all, the FBI usually only grabs the case when the suspect is
known
and
the case is solved. We won't even discuss prosecutions, although the
FBI
track record is not a very good one - for whatever reasons.
(See
<underline><color><param>0000,0000,fefe</param>http:\\trc.syr.edu/tracfbi</color></underline>
- Assuming the site is still there.)
Suffice it to say that the really bad guys will not get caught while the
"vandals" may, sometimes, with a little luck. What is anyone doing to
catch the Russian Ex-KGB-Trained Ph.D. computer scientist? The real
threat in an IW environment?
In the business world (usually) you either meet your goals or look for
another job. In the government, ala FBI, you ask for more people and funding.
So, you get more for being less successful. If you doubt, read the FBI
Director's speeches to Congress. He talks of serious problems and wants
more money and agents to solve it. How about diverting the resources, it
is called reallocation of resources in business, to the priorities of
economic espionage and less worrying about teenie bopper hackers. The
businesses are responsible to the stockholders and should take care of themselves. The
US Government should keep their defenses current. This latest Pentagon
public embarrassment could have been pretty much avoided if only those
patches were installed. Ah, the coulda, woulda, shoulda's strike again!
But hey, the DISA teams and the GAO have been
pointing that out for several years! Now, we should put an entire new
bureaucracy in place because they (those responsible for govt. systems)
are not meeting their obligations? As taxpayers and "stockholders" in
our country, and it is OUR government, maybe we should have a class-action lawsuit
against these people for failing to adequately protect OUR national assets! IT IS OUR STUFF! They are the caretakers and frankly should be fired! Bring in a new group! If
they don't do it, fire them! Eventually, somebody will get the message
and do it right!
What can we do to help shore up our defenses? We must continue to work
quietly in the trenches building those defenses, plugging holes, and
concentrating on protecting those information assets that our employers
pay us to protect. If we all did that, share information, help each
other - 1-1, then over time we will progress. We will never be totally
successful-such is the nature of the beast- but we can each take a bite
out of that beast. Hey! It beats trying to eat the beast alone!
Jerry
Dr. Gerald L. Kovacich, CFE, CPP, CISSP
(Reporting from the trenches)
<<Moderator>- Whew! Dr. Jer!!! You have a way with words! Anyone care to comment?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 19:47:36 -0800
From: Bertil Haggman <<bertil.haggman@helsingborg.se>
Subject: Micro Warfare - FYI
Betty,
Sending you a few notes I have made
on micro warfare. Any recommendations
you have on sources for this I would
be most interested.
MODERN MICRO WARFARE AND MICRO WEAPONS
During the 1980s the Strategic Defense Initiative
(SDI) was important in winning the Cold War. In
the search of weapons of the future, information
warfare techniques have come to play an
increasingly vital role in prognoses concerning of
future wars. US Department of Defense scientists
now seem to be looking to another kind of weapons
for future war: micro systems.
What has made this possible is advances in
miniaturisation. The basic idea is to use
thousands of small and cheap weapons to track the
enemy. The goal is to reduce the number of
soldiers on the ground. Troops on the ground will
always be important. The totally automated
battlefield is most likely science fiction.
"Attack microbots"
These are a class of highly miniaturized (one
millimeter scale) electromechanical systems
capable of being deployed en masse and performing
individual or collective target attack. Several
deployment approaches are possible: dispersal as
an aerosol, transportation by a larger platform,
and full flying and crawling autonomy. For attack
a variety of robotic effectors can be used as well
as electromagnetic measures, or energetic
materials.
Microbots can provide unobtrusive, pervasive
intervention into adversary environments and
systems. The extremely small size provides high
penetration capabilities and natural stealth.
"Weeds with cameras and sensors"
Artificial weeds are among designs under
investigation. These weeds or blades of grass
could be fitted with small cameras and sensors
able to detect movement of tanks or other
vehicles.
"Miniaircrafts"
Small aircrafts no bigger than a banknote could
carry sensors which could "smell" diesel engine
exhaust, take infrared pictures or relay target
co-ordinates to for instance missile batteries
hundreds of miles away.
"Ant sized soldiers"
Another idea under development is the building of
"ant sized soldiers". These tiny robots would have
a solar panel on their backs to power its legs.
This would allow them to walk down streets or into
command headquarters. Each "soldier" would carry
sensors, or converted into a "wasp", enough
explosives to destroy power lines or computer
cables.
"Microsubmarines" and Other Systems
Civilian systems that could have military
application are air-bags, night vision screens for
cars and microsubmarines developed for pipeline
inspection.
"Micro air vehicles" (MAV)
Georgia Institute of Technology is studying MAVs
in its "MicroFlyer" program. There are, however, a
host of problems. One cannot probably just make
aeroplanes smaller and smaller. Probably another
method for motion has to be used.
New types of flight control have to be designed,
different power sources, propulsion systems and
avionics. The size of the MAVs would be within the
50 grams (two ounces) range for the vehicle and
payload.
New control concepts have to be studied as well as
tiny jet turbine engines, pulsejets, ducted fans
etc.
Batteries and other electrical sources offer a
challenge as well.
If flown under human control the MAVs must be
independent enough to avoid obstacles and maintain
stable flight by themselves.
A MAV would ideally not cost more than $ 1,000 US
dollars per unit at present.
Funding and More
Miniature planes are already being funded by the
US military and US government scientists are
already working on a series of projects funded by
DARPA. Many of the underlying technologies for the
new systems are already available. Scientists at
Case Western Reserve University in Ohio have
produced motors so small that 1,000 of them could
fit inside a 5 mm square.
Miniturisation might be changing development from
large and expensive platforms like fighter planes
and aircraft carriers to smaller systems.
"You get hurt when you have four systems and two
get destroyed. But if you have 1,000 systems and
100 crash, you can walk away. In other words, you
have enough so that you have a disposable weapon",
says Martin Libicki of the US Institute for
National Strategic Studies.
The first weapons might be in service within five
years and a vast number within a decade.
Bertil Haggman, author
Member, Swedish Authors Association
E-mail: bertil.haggman@helsingborg.se
<<Moderator> Please forward any relevant resources to Mr. Haggman.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4) Subject: Red Team
To: betty@infowar.com (Betty G.O'Hearn)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 20:31:11 -0800 (PST)
----------------
The RedTeam mailing list - redteam@all.net
home page: <underline><color><param>0000,0000,fefe</param>http://all.net/redteam
</color></underline>
Mission:
Our mission is to discuss issues surrounding red teaming in all its
forms - from the definition of what it is to how to do it and
everywhere between.
Rules:
The mailing list is fully moderated
No advertising
You will not be solicited
Be polite and respectful
Sign up / post to list / unsubscribe: email redteam@all.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
5) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 06:01:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Ralph McGehee <<rmcgehee@igc.apc.org>
To: infowar@infowar.com
Subject: CIA Support of Drug Traffickers
The CIA's Inspector General's pending report says the CIA maintained
contact with drug traffickers supporting contra Nicaraguan rebels in the 1980s.
"Dozens of people and a number of companies..." were involved in drug
trafficking. Such trafficking brought drugs into the U.S. The information,
is detailed in a 600-page classified report scheduled to be sent to Congress
later this month. The IG also said that under an agreement in 1982 between
then-Attorney General William French Smith and the CIA, agency officers were
not required to report allegations of drug trafficking involving non-employees
-- defined as meaning paid and non-paid "assets [meaning agents], pilots who
ferried supplies to the contras, as well as contra officials and others."
This policy was modified in 1986 when CIA was prohibited from paying "U.S.
dollars" (emphasis added) to any individual or company found to be involved
in drug dealing. Rep. Dicks, called for more hearings, including
possible testimony from Oliver L. North. Washington Post 3/17/98 A12.
R. McGehee comment -- It was impossible for the IG to deny the dozens if
not hundreds of articles and reports of CIA involvement with drug runners.
It was surprising, however, to see that the Attorney General agreed officially
with CIA -- that the leading drug traffic fighting/detection Agency of the
U.S. Government -- was not required to report on the drug traffic -- even
drugs entering the United States. What the IG's pending 600-page report
apparently does not include is the history of the CIA's involvement with drug
traffickers -- especially traffickers in the "Golden Triangle" during the
Vietnam and Laotian wars; and traffickers in the "Golden Crescent," in the
Afghan War. It seems that every major CIA covert paramilitary operation
enlists traffickers. This should be especially troubling and
condemnatory given the CIA's past and present responsibility for
"counternarcotics" operations. When will (or has it already) the next or
current CIA covert action program condone drug trafficking?
Ralph McGehee
CIABASE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
6) From: Jason Serrato <<wzuphlmz@flash.net>
To: "betty g.o'hearn" <<betty@infowar.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:23:59 -0800
Subject: Assistance
The KGB Files is being produced by Associated Televison International. Any and all input would be appreciated. My direct dial is 213.871.1340 x201. My personal pager is 310.405.8412.
<<Moderator> If you can forward info - please do.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
7) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 21:00:28 -0500
To: betty@infowar.com
From: "E.S. Sim" <<evian@escape.com>
Subject: Wanted ASAP: Expert witness for Mitnick trial
Computer Expert Witness Needed *Immediately*.
A computer expert is needed immediately to testify as an expert witness
in an ongoing criminal matter in Federal District Court in Los Angeles.
Kevin Mitnick is seeking a highly credentialed expert in computer
security, telecommunications, system and network administration to testify
in this highly publicized computer "hacking" case.
This will be a groundbreaking case and is expected to attract significant
media coverage. Testimony will be required as early as March 30, 1998 in
Los Angeles, California. Further testimony will be needed at trial, later
this year. Expert witness fees will be paid by the federal court.
Qualified candidates must have an advanced degree and be knowledgeable in
DOS, Windows, SunOS, VAX/VMS, and Internet operations. Experience with
cellular telephone networks is a plus. Previous expert testimony and/or
publication are preferred.
Qualified candidates please contact Mr. Mitnick though his appointed
defense counsel, Donald C. Randolph, Esq. at (310) 395-7900.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
8)From: doug_campbell_at_awaats1a@mail2.hq.faa.gov
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 98 09:12:04 -0500
To: <<infowar@infowar.com>
Subject: Hacker Shuts Down Airport
An article on hacking bringing down an airport:
See <underline><color><param>0000,0000,fefe</param>http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9803/18/juvenile.hacker/</color></underline> for an
article concerning sentencing of a Massachusetts teen hacker who
disabled communications to the air traffic control tower at the
Worcester, Massachusetts, airport in 1997. The hacker knocked out
phone service at the control tower, airport security, the airport fire
department, the weather service, and carriers that use the airport.
Also, the tower's main radio transmitter and another transmitter that
activates runway lights were shut down, as well as a printer that
controllers use to monitor flight progress.
<<Moderator> HackerDumb has been quite busy lately.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
9) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 15:32:15 -0500
From: "Security Information News Service (SINS)" <<ravensceo@MCIONE.COM>
Subject: Press Release
To: infowar@infowar.com, ravensceo@mcione.com
<center><fontfamily><param>Arial Black</param><smaller>IAM / Secure Data Systems, Inc.</smaller></fontfamily>
For Immediate Release
03 / 24 / 98
Press Release
Contact: Ian A. Murphy, Pres. & CEIO
215-739-2357, 739-4315
E-mail: ravensceo@mcione.com
<bold><smaller>Computer Hackers on the offensive after the Hacker Analyzer is arrested in Israel. Multiple Government and Corporate Web Sites under massive retaliatory cyber-attack! International Cyber-Terrorism raising it's specter in this full fledged assault upon the Internet!</smaller></bold><smaller><smaller>
</smaller><bold>Gladwyne, PA </bold><smaller>
</smaller></smaller>
</center>Ian A. Murphy, Pres. of IAM / Secure Data Systems, Inc., today issued a terse warning to the
Systems owners connected to the Internet. " After the recent arrest of the "Pentagon Hackers" in the US and Israel, certain cyber-terroristic factions of the computer underground have taken an active offensive role in the defense of the arrested hackers. The Underground Hacker group known as the Enforcers have undertaken a massive assault upon the Internet and Information systems world-wide. Corporate and Govt. web sites have been attacked and defaced in such a manner, that no system should be left without full security procedures and policies firmly in place. Internet Sites that have been attacked can be found on a listing at the web site www.antionline.com. This current example of cyber-terrorism will continue to escalate in the near future and is showing just how vulnerable we all are to these types of Cyber-Terroristic attacks. These Cyber-Terrorists, only armed with average desk-top computers and connections to the Internet, have shown that any system connected to the Int!
ernet may fall prey to these intrusions. Call it the Cyber-version of a home intrusion and you get a better idea. These attacks offer a unique view of the power of the Internet to reach out and touch all lives in many manners yet unseen by the general population. In addition, such blatant attacks only serve to underscore the complete lack of overall Information Security provided to these systems that contain all of our Personal, Business, Medical, Insurance, Criminal & Educational Information. Without the complete and total assurance of such systems, we can never be safe from such assaults upon our lives, our incomes and our National Security. This glowing example should be a warning to all that use and depend upon the Internet for Commerce, Research and Entertainment.
<center>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
</center>Subscriptions or Changes to Your Subscription:
DIRECT REQUESTS to: list@infowar.com with one-line in the BODY, NOT
in the subject line. Please DO NOT write to Betty.
Subscribe infowar TO JOIN GROUP or sign up on the home page of
<underline><color><param>0000,0000,fefe</param>http://www.infowar.com</color></underline>.
Unsubscribe infowar TO LEAVE GROUP Please DO NOT reply to this email to
unsubscribe.
****************************************************************************
PERMISSION IS GIVEN TO DISTRIBUTE WIDELY
****************************************************************************
Betty O'Hearn
Assistant to Mr. Winn Schwartau
813-360-6256 Voice
813-363-7277 FAX
http://www.infowar.com
http://www.info-sec.com
-o-
Subscribe: mail majordomo@sekurity.org with "subscribe isn".
Today's ISN Sponsor: Repent Security Incorporated
Received on Thu Mar 26 17:22:07 1998